A large fraction of Canadians think that space tourism flights to other planets would be possible within the next 100 years, according to the results of a poll reported by the Canadian Press. A whopping 85 percent thought that such vacations would be possible in the next century “or more”, including 13 percent who believed that such jaunts could be possible in the next 50 years. However, “futurist” Mike Dover of Toronto consultancy New Paradigm tried to put the kibosh on such thoughts in the Canadian Press article: “I don’t see that it would be in the realm of possibilities for amateur or civilian travel for many, many centuries.” Of course, it depends on what’s meant by vacations to other planets—or, for that matter, what a “planet” is. After all, Space Adventures is recruiting passengers for a circumlunar flight that could take place in the next several years, not centuries.
Space tourism, public space travel, and the beginnings of a new industry
Search
Categories
- Business (351)
- Andrews Space (1)
- ARCA (2)
- Armadillo Aerospace (45)
- Benson Space Company (13)
- Bigelow Aerospace (25)
- Blue Origin (16)
- da Vinci Project (3)
- EADS Astrium (3)
- Incredible Adventures (3)
- Interorbital Systems (2)
- Masten Space (6)
- Micro-Space (1)
- Planetspace (14)
- Rocket Racing League (6)
- Rocketplane Global (1)
- Rocketplane Kistler (38)
- Scaled Composites (34)
- ShareSpace Foundation (1)
- Space Access LLC (2)
- Space Adventures (55)
- Space Shot (9)
- SpaceDev (9)
- SpaceX (7)
- Sprague Astronautics (1)
- Starchaser (4)
- t/Space (3)
- TGV Rockets (0)
- UP Aerospace (1)
- Virgin Galactic (98)
- X Prize Foundation (9)
- XCOR Aerospace (8)
- Commentary (16)
- Events (87)
- Extraorbital (8)
- General (60)
- Orbital (100)
- Organizations (2)
- People (173)
- Prizes (11)
- Publications/Blogs (0)
- Regulatory (22)
- Spaceports (93)
- Suborbital (80)
- Technology (4)
Links
Companies
- Armadillo Aerospace
- Bigelow Aerospace
- Blue Origin
- Incrdible Adventures
- Interorbital Systems
- Masten Space Systems
- Personal Spaceflight Federation
- PlanetSpace
- Rocket Racing League
- Rocketplane Ltd.
- Scaled Composites
- Space Adventures
- SpaceDev
- SpaceX
- Sprague Astronautics
- Starchaser Industries Ltd.
- t/Space
- TGV Rockets
- The GoldenPalace.com Space Program Powered by the da Vinci Project
- Virgin Galactic
- XCOR Aerospace
Archives
- June 2008 (7)
- May 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (12)
- February 2008 (10)
- January 2008 (12)
- December 2007 (14)
- November 2007 (16)
- October 2007 (34)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (12)
- July 2007 (23)
- June 2007 (13)
- May 2007 (24)
- April 2007 (25)
- March 2007 (29)
- February 2007 (22)
- January 2007 (19)
- December 2006 (19)
- November 2006 (21)
- October 2006 (72)
- September 2006 (43)
- August 2006 (30)
- July 2006 (34)
- June 2006 (26)
- May 2006 (48)
- April 2006 (47)
- March 2006 (1)
- February 2006 (2)
© 2005 Jeff Foust
All Rights Reserved.
20 queries in 0.551 secs
Copperleaf Plus
2 comments so far
(You have a plant where you want a planet.)
How could it possibly take centuries? Aside from a global collapse of civilization, that seems pessimistic to an absurd level. It didn’t take much more than ten years to go from first orbit of anything to first man on the moon. First tourist around the moon will happen in a few years, first tourist on the moon a few more years after that. And if Musk gets his way, Mars next.
I stand by the point (although I didn’t say many many centuries). A lot of development needs to happen before there can be tourism on other planets. Unless tourists are willing to go into suspended animation or space travel and near warp speed becomes possible, we are looking at probably just Mars or Europa as candidate destinations.
Will civilians be able to travel to them in manner similar to what we call vacations within the next hundred years? I doubt it.
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>