<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008: &#8220;Year of the Spaceship&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/12/07/2008-year-of-the-spaceship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/12/07/2008-year-of-the-spaceship/</link>
	<description>Space tourism, public space travel, and the beginnings of a new industry</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/12/07/2008-year-of-the-spaceship/#comment-221978</link>
		<dc:creator>Rand Simberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/12/07/2008-year-of-the-spaceship/#comment-221978</guid>
		<description>I wonder what they're using for SS2 propulsion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what they&#8217;re using for SS2 propulsion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/12/07/2008-year-of-the-spaceship/#comment-220819</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/12/07/2008-year-of-the-spaceship/#comment-220819</guid>
		<description>Exciting stuff!!!  Can't wait to see it!  I'll bet they're further along with the fabrication of the two vehicles than Burt will let Virgin admit though.  

But yeah, I think 2008 will be "the Year of the Spaceship"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exciting stuff!!!  Can&#8217;t wait to see it!  I&#8217;ll bet they&#8217;re further along with the fabrication of the two vehicles than Burt will let Virgin admit though.  </p>
<p>But yeah, I think 2008 will be &#8220;the Year of the Spaceship&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chance</title>
		<link>http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/12/07/2008-year-of-the-spaceship/#comment-220562</link>
		<dc:creator>Chance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalspaceflight.info/2007/12/07/2008-year-of-the-spaceship/#comment-220562</guid>
		<description>How many months of testing will be needed before the ships are ready for paying customers?  I'm thinking that 2009 would be a more likely year to deserve this "year of the spaceship" name.  Even if Virgin launches a few late in 2008, 2009 will show once and for all the economic viability of personal space flight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many months of testing will be needed before the ships are ready for paying customers?  I&#8217;m thinking that 2009 would be a more likely year to deserve this &#8220;year of the spaceship&#8221; name.  Even if Virgin launches a few late in 2008, 2009 will show once and for all the economic viability of personal space flight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
